CATHOLIC ENCYCLOPEDIA History of Marriage.Help support New Advent and get the full contents of this website as an instant download.Includes the Catholic Encyclopedia, Church Fathers, Summa, Bible and more all for only 1.The word marriage may be taken to denote the action, contract, formality, or ceremony by which the conjugal union is formed or the union itself as an enduring condition.In this article we deal for the most part with marriage as a condition, and with its moral and social aspects.It is usually defined as the legitimate union between husband and wife.California marriage license fee varies by county and valid for 90 days.Minimum age to marry is 18.No waiting period, blood test or residency requirements.Cover Letter from USC Spouse, Primary Sponsor Explaining knowledge of Financial Obligations towards sponsoring you, the applicant Completed Form I864, USC.Back to Essays JEAN BAPTISTE POINT DE SABLE THE FOUNDER OF MODERN CHICAGO by John F.Swenson, 1999, all rights reserved.Mit Microsoft Word 2003 Flyer Erstellen Kostenlos .This essay is currently undergoing.State Law Officiants Requirements.Usually the state laws licensing provide any recognized member of the clergy such as a Priest, Minister, Rabbi, Imam, Cantor.Chicago Marriage License Form' title='Chicago Marriage License Form' />Legitimate indicates the sanction of some kind of law, natural, evangelical, or civil, while the phrase, husband and wife, implies mutual rights of sexual intercourse, life in common, and an enduring union.The last two characters distinguish marriage, respectively, from concubinage and fornication.The definition, however, is broad enough to comprehend polygamous and polyandrous unions when they are permitted by the civil law for in such relationships there are as many marriages as there are individuals of the numerically larger sex.Whether promiscuity, the condition in which all the men of a group maintain relations and live indiscriminately with all the women, can be properly called marriage, may well be doubted.In such a relation cohabitation and domestic life are devoid of that exclusiveness which is commonly associated with the idea of conjugal union.The theory of primitive promiscuity.All authorities agree that during historical times promiscuity has been either non existent or confined to a few small groups.Did it prevail to any extent during the prehistoric period of the race Writing between 1.Bachofen, Morgan, Mc.Lennan, Lubbock, and Giraud Teulon, maintained that this was the original relationship between the sexes among practically all peoples.So rapidly did the theory win favour that in 1.Westermarck, treated by many writers as a demonstrated truth History of Human.Marriage, p.It appealed strongly to those believers in organic evolution who assumed that the social customs of primitive man, including sex relations, must have differed but slightly from the corresponding usages among the brutes.It has been eagerly adopted by the Marxian Socialists, on account of its agreement with their theories of primitive common property and of economicdeterminism.According to the latter hypothesis, all other social institutions are, and have ever been, determined by the underlying economic institutions hence in the original condition of common property, wives and husbands must likewise have been held in common see Engles, The Origin of the Family, Private Property, and the State, tr.German, Chicago, 1.Indeed, the vogue which the theory of promiscuity for a time enjoyed seems to have been due far more to a priori considerations of the kind just mentioned, and to the wish to believe in it, than to positive evidence.About the only direct testimony in its favour is found in the fragmentary statements of some ancient writers, such as Herodotus and Strabo, concerning a few unimportant peoples, and in the accounts of some modern travellers regarding some uncivilized tribes of the present day.Chicago Marriage License Form' title='Chicago Marriage License Form' />Neither of these classes of testimony clearly shows that the peoples to which they refer practised promiscuity, and both are entirely too few to justify the generalization that all peoples lived originally in the conditions which they describe.As for the indirect evidence in favour of the theory, consisting of inferences from such social customs as the tracing of kinship through the mother, religious prostitution, unrestrained sexual intercourse previous to marriage among some savage peoples, and primitive community of goods, none of these conditions can be proved to have been universal at any stage of human development, and every one of them can be explained more easily and more naturally on other grounds than on the assumption of promiscuity.We may say that the positive arguments in favour of the theory of primitive promiscuity seem insufficient to give it any degree of probability, while the biological, economic, psychological, and historical arguments brought against it by many recent writers, e.Westermarck op. Nfs Underground 2 Download Completo Para Pc Portuguese on this page. The attitude of contemporary scholars is thus described by Howard The researches of several recent writers, notably those of Starcke and Westermarck, confirming in part and further developing the earlier conclusions of Darwin and Spencer, have established a probability that marriage or pairing between one man and one woman, though the union be often transitory and the rule frequently violated, is the typicalform of sexual union from the infancy of the human race History of Matrimonial.Institutions, I, pp.Polyandry and polygamy.One deviation from the typicalform of secular union which, however, is also called marriage, is polyandry, the union of several husbands with one wife.It has been practised at various times by a considerable number of people or tribes.It existed among the ancient Britons, the primitive Arabs, the inhabitants of the Canary Islands, the Aborigines of America, the Hottentots, the inhabitants of India, Ceylon, Thibet, Malabar, and New Zealand.In the great majority of these instances polyandry was the exceptional form of conjugal union.Monogamy and even polygamy were much more prevalent.The greater number of the polyandrous unions seem to have been of the kind called fraternal that is the husbands in each conjugal group were all brothers.Frequently, if not generally, the first husband enjoyed conjugal and domestic rights superior to the others, was, in fact, the chief husband.The others were husbands only in a secondary and limited sense.Both these circumstances show that even in the comparatively few cases in which polyandry existed it was softened in the direction of monogamy for the wife belonged not to several entirely independent men, but to a group united by the closest ties of blood she was married to one family rather than to one person.And the fact that one of her consorts possessed superior marital privileges shows that she had only one husband in the full sense of the term.Some writers, e.Mc. Lennan Studies in Ancient.History, pp.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |